Lymphatic expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 is linked to sentinel node positivity, recurrence and mortality in primary cutaneous melanoma.

Lymphangiogenesis is a precursor to lymphovascular invasion, and may therefore signal a higher risk of metastasis and mortality in primary cutaneous melanoma. This retrospective longitudinal study aimed to evaluate whether emergent lymphangiogenesis, as measured through co-expression of endothelial proteins with the proliferation marker Ki67, was associated with poorer prognosis in a cohort of patients with single primary cutaneous melanoma. We screened all patients with a single locally invasive primary cutaneous melanoma who received sentinel lymph node biopsy at a tertiary dermatology centre in Brisbane, Australia between 1994 and 2007. Primary melanoma sections were stained via Opal multiplex immunofluorescence, and categorized according to the presence of Ki67 within either CD31+ or D2-40+ endothelial cells. Multivariate Cox regression modelling was used to evaluate associations between endothelial Ki67 positivity and clinical outcomes, with adjustment for age, sex, Breslow depth, ulceration, and anatomical location. Overall, 264 patients were available for analysis, with a median follow-up duration of 7.1 years. The presence of D2-40+ /Ki67+ co-expression was associated with greater melanoma-specific mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-3.10; p = 0.001) and recurrence (adjusted HR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.33-3.10; p = 0.001) relative to absence. CD31+ /Ki67+ co-expression was not prognostic in this cohort. Lymphatic proliferation, as measured through D2-40+ /Ki67+ co-expression, predicted greater melanoma-specific mortality and recurrence in this cohort of primary cutaneous melanoma.

iCare - a self-directed, interactive online program to improve health and wellbeing for people living with upper gastrointestinal or hepato-pancreato-biliary cancers, and their informal carers: the study protocol for a Phase II randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Up to 70% of people diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract or hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancers experience substantial reductions in quality of life (QoL), including high distress levels, pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, weight loss and difficulty swallowing. With few advocacy groups and support systems for adults with upper GI or HPB cancers (i.e. pancreas, liver, stomach, bile duct and oesophageal) and their carers, online supportive care programs may represent an alternate cost-effective mechanism to support this patient group and carers. iCare is a self-directed, interactive, online program that provides information, resources, and psychological packages to patients and their carers from the treatment phase of their condition. The inception and development of iCare has been driven by consumers, advocacy groups, government and health professionals. The aims of this study are to determine the feasibility and acceptability of iCare, examine preliminary efficacy on health-related QoL and carer burden at 3- and 6-months post enrolment, and the potential cost-effectiveness of iCare, from health and societal perspectives, for both patients and carers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A Phase II randomised controlled trial. Overall, 162 people with newly diagnosed upper GI or HPB cancers and 162 carers will be recruited via the Upper GI Cancer Registry, online advertisements, or hospital clinics. Patients and carers will be randomly allocated (1:1) to the iCare program or usual care. Participant assessments will be at enrolment, 3- and 6-months later. The primary outcomes are i) feasibility, measured by eligibility, recruitment, response and attrition rates, and ii) acceptability, measured by engagement with iCare (frequency of logins, time spent using iCare, and use of features over the intervention period). Secondary outcomes are patient changes in QoL and unmet needs, and carer burden, unmet needs and QoL. Linear mixed models will be fitted to obtain preliminary estimates of efficacy and variability for secondary outcomes. The economic analysis will include a cost-consequences analysis where all outcomes will be compared with costs. DISCUSSION: iCare provides a potential model of supportive care to improve QoL, unmet needs and burden of disease among people living with upper GI or HPB cancers and their carers. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: ACTRN12623001185651. This protocol reflects Version #1 26 April 2023.

Intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumour in a 56-year-old female: Case report of a very rare presentation of an unusual tumour.

INTRODUCTION: This case report discusses the rare diagnosis of intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumour (DSRCT) in a 56-year-old female. PRESENTATION OF CASE: An incidental intra-abdominal lesion was found during investigation of joint pain. Ultrasound-guided biopsy suggested desmoid tumour, after undergoing laparotomy and en-bloc excision of the tumour due to concerning radiological progression, the final histology was desmoplastic small round cell tumour. At six-week follow-up imaging, no recurrence or metastatic disease was noted. She declined chemotherapy and specialist follow-up, electing to have routine follow up with her General Practitioner only. DISCUSSION: Intra-abdominal DSRCT is rare and mainly seen in young males. To our knowledge, this is the only reported case of DSRCT in a female over the age of 50. CONCLUSION: There should be timely discussion between different surgical units to provide efficient care. Any disparity between radiological and histological appearance should prompt further review and investigation in order to ensure misdiagnosis is avoided and appropriate treatment is provided. Despite cytoreductive surgery, survival is dismal due to the aggressive nature of the tumour, and its low numbers limiting adequate study into post diagnosis care.

Long-term deaths from melanoma according to tumor thickness at diagnosis.

There is little long-term follow-up information about how the number of melanoma deaths and case fatality vary over time according to the measured thickness of melanoma at diagnosis. This population-based longitudinal cohort study examines patterns and trends in case fatality among 44,531 people in Queensland (Australia) diagnosed with a single invasive melanoma (International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, third revision [ICD-O-3], C44, Morphology 872-879) between 1987 and 2011, including 11,883 diagnosed between 1987 and 1996, with up to 20 years follow-up (to December 2016). The 20-year case fatality increased by thickness, with the percentage of melanoma deaths within 20 years of diagnosis being up to 4.8% for melanomas with measured thickness <0.80 mm, 10.6% for tumors 0.8 to <1.0 mm and generally more than 30% for melanomas measuring 3 mm and more. For melanomas <1.0 mm, most deaths occurred between 5 and 20 years after diagnosis, whereas for thicker melanomas the reverse was true with most deaths occurring within the first 5 years. Five-year case fatality decreased over successive calendar time periods for melanomas <1.0 mm, but not for melanomas ≥1.0 mm. These findings demonstrate that the time course for fatal melanomas varies markedly according to tumor thickness at diagnosis. Improved understanding of the patient factors and characteristics of melanomas, in addition to tumor thickness, which increase the likelihood of progression, is needed to guide clinical diagnosis, communication with patients and ongoing surveillance pathways of patients with potentially fatal lesions.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-resection volume region: a population-level study examining the impact of hospital-volume on surgical quality and longer-term survival.

BACKGROUND: An association between higher hospital-volume and better "quality of surgery" and long-term survival has not been reported following pancreatic cancer surgery in low resection-volume regions such as in Australia. Using a population-level study, we compare "quality of surgery" and two-year survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy between Australian hospitals grouped by resection-volume. METHODS: Data on all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma in the Australian state of Queensland, between 2001 and 2015, were obtained from the Queensland Oncology Repository. Hospitals were grouped into high (≥6 resections annually) and low (<6) volume centres. Following adjustment for case-mix, "quality-of-treatment" indicators were compared between hospital groups using multivariate logistic regression and Poisson regression analysis; and two-year cancer-specific and overall survival were compared using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Compared with high-volume centres, low-volume centres had worse two-year cancer-specific survival (Adjusted HR = 1.31; 95% CI:1.03-1.68), higher 30-day mortality (Adjusted IRR = 3.81; 95% CI: 1.36-10.62) and fewer patients received "high-quality surgery" (Adjusted OR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33-0.90). Differences in 30-day mortality, or "quality-of-treatment" indicators did not entirely explain the observed survival difference between hospital-volume groups. CONCLUSION: In an Australian environment, a "high" hospital-volume was significantly associated with better quality surgery and two-year survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic as adjuvant therapy for patients with resected, MAGE-A3-positive, stage III melanoma (DERMA): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite newly approved treatments, metastatic melanoma remains a life-threatening condition. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic in patients with stage IIIB or IIIC melanoma in the adjuvant setting. METHODS: DERMA was a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done in 31 countries and 263 centres. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and had histologically proven, completely resected, stage IIIB or IIIC, MAGE-A3-positive cutaneous melanoma with macroscopic lymph node involvement and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1. Randomisation and treatment allocation at the investigator sites were done centrally via the internet. We randomly assigned patients (2:1) to receive up to 13 intramuscular injections of recombinant MAGE-A3 with AS15 immunostimulant (MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic; 300 µg MAGE-A3 antigen plus 420 µg CpG 7909 reconstituted in AS01B to a total volume of 0·5 mL), or placebo, over a 27-month period: five doses at 3-weekly intervals, followed by eight doses at 12-weekly intervals. The co-primary outcomes were disease-free survival in the overall population and in patients with a potentially predictive gene signature (GS-positive) identified previously and validated here via an adaptive signature design. The final analyses included all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment; analyses for efficacy were in the as-randomised population and for safety were in the as-treated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00796445. FINDINGS: Between Dec 1, 2008, and Sept 19, 2011, 3914 patients were screened, 1391 randomly assigned, and 1345 started treatment (n=895 for MAGE-A3 and n=450 for placebo). At final analysis (data cutoff May 23, 2013), median follow-up was 28·0 months [IQR 23·3-35·5] in the MAGE-A3 group and 28·1 months [23·7-36·9] in the placebo group. Median disease-free survival was 11·0 months (95% CI 10·0-11·9) in the MAGE-A3 group and 11·2 months (8·6-14·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·01, 0·88-1·17, p=0·86). In the GS-positive population, median disease-free survival was 9·9 months (95% CI 5·7-17·6) in the MAGE-A3 group and 11·6 months (5·6-22·3) in the placebo group (HR 1·11, 0·83-1·49, p=0·48). Within the first 31 days of treatment, adverse events of grade 3 or worse were reported by 126 (14%) of 894 patients in the MAGE-A3 group and 56 (12%) of 450 patients in the placebo group, treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse by 36 (4%) patients given MAGE-A3 vs six (1%) patients given placebo, and at least one serious adverse event by 14% of patients in both groups (129 patients given MAGE-A3 and 64 patients given placebo). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neoplasms (33 [4%] patients in the MAGE-A3 group vs 17 [4%] patients in the placebo group), general disorders and administration site conditions (25 [3%] for MAGE-A3 vs four [<1%] for placebo) and infections and infestations (17 [2%] for MAGE-A3 vs seven [2%] for placebo). No deaths were related to treatment. INTERPRETATION: An antigen-specific immunotherapeutic alone was not efficacious in this clinical setting. Based on these findings, development of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic for use in melanoma has been stopped. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.

Australian Multicenter Study of Isolated Limb Infusion for Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Isolated limb infusion (ILI) offers a less invasive alternative to isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for the treatment of locally advanced extremity melanoma. In Australia, ILI has essentially completely replaced ILP. The aim of this study was to collect and evaluate the results of ILI in an Australian multicenter setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The results of 316 first ILI procedures, performed between 1992 and 2008 in five Australian institutions, were collectively analyzed, with all five institutions using the same protocol. Melphalan was circulated in the isolated limb for 20-30 min (±actinomycin D). Response was determined using the World Health Organization criteria, and limb toxicity was assessed using the Wieberdink scale. RESULTS: The median patient age was 74 years (range 28-100) and 59 % of patients were female. Overall response rate was 75 % (complete response [CR] 33 %; partial response 42 %). Stable disease was seen in 18 % of patients and progressive disease in 7 %. Wieberdink grade III or higher was seen in 30 % of the cases. No toxicity-related amputations occurred, and median survival was 44 months. In patients with a CR, median survival was 80 months (p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, Breslow thickness, lower-limb ILI, and a procedure performed at the Melanoma Institute Australia remained significant predictors for response, although not for survival. CONCLUSIONS: This Australian multicenter study of ILI is the largest reported to date. ILI is a useful technique that can be safely and effectively performed across tertiary referral centers for the successful management of advanced extremity melanoma. Increased optimization of perioperative factors might allow response rates to be raised further, while maintaining acceptable toxicity.

Defining cure for esophageal cancer: analysis of actual 5-year survivors following esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is the mainstay of curative treatment for localized esophageal cancer. However, what constitutes cure is not well defined. This study was undertaken to characterize actual 5-year survivors following esophagectomy and to determine prognostic factors for disease-specific survival (DSS) from 60 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 2004, 398 consecutive patients underwent esophagectomy and had potential for 5 years follow-up. Clinicopathological factors associated with DSS from 5 years onward were analyzed. RESULTS: Median DSS was 25 months. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered to 159 of 398 (40%). There were 114 of 398 (29%) actual 5-year survivors. On multivariate analysis, 5-year survivors were significantly more likely to have lower T classification, N classification, and R0 resections compared with patients who died less than 5 years after surgery. There were 66 of 398 patients (17%) with positive margins, and 6 of these were 5-year survivors. Of the 114 5-year survivors, 17 (15%) subsequently died of esophageal cancer. Prognostic factors for DSS after surviving 5 years were age and T classification for patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy and surgery alone, respectively. Powerful prognostic factors from time of treatment, including nodal status, were no longer prognostic factors after surviving to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: No single clinicopathological variable negated survival to 5 years. Prognostication once surviving 5 years is difficult. The majority of 5-year survivors can be considered cured of esophageal cancer.